Two thirds world debt

Futurist Keynote Speaker: Posts, Slides, Videos - Future of Emerging Markets - Keynote Speaker


debtTwo thirds world debt is one of the world's biggest killers

Jubilee 2000 is an international debt forgiveness campaign, aiming to help emerging countries to become economically self-sufficient. Many countries have run up massive debts. Since these debts can only be paid through export earnings, the best way to measure the burden is by comparing export earnings with total debt. Examples (World Bank figures 1998):

  • Somalia - total debt $2.6bn - as % of export earnings 3,671
  • Sudan - total debt $16.9bn - as % of export earnings 2,131
  • Rwanda - total debt $1bn - as % of export earnings 1,374

Every time you give $1 in aid for a project on a developing country, at least $1 is taken from that country in interest on long term debts to banks or other governments or UN bodies. In some cases the ratio is as high as $1 donated to $3 extracted.

As a direct result, spending on health and education has actually fallen in some of the poorest nations over a decade when the rest of the world has become more prosperous.

What can be done? Clearly, those who are owed money are extremely unlikely to see their money back. Therefore, the logic is to write off these debts, and to be more cautious about lending money in future. Sadly, in many cases, substantial parts of these loans were spent propping up corrupt regimes and lining the pockets of dictators.

A compromise is the debt swap programme. Let us take a bank which is owed $1bn, shown on their balance sheet. In reality the loan agreement is almost worthless since the bank has little way of enforcing repayments on a country that has no foreign currency to pay interest or repay capital. Along comes a development agency wanting to invest in health promotion and care, with a budget of $100,000. The agency offers to buy the debt off the bank for $100,000, and the bank is delighted. The agency agrees at the same time with the debt-crippled government that this debt will only be paid off if the government agrees to spend the equivalent of $100,000 in local currency on approved health programmes.

In theory, the net result is that a major debt is cancelled, and the local economy is stimulated. In practice, these arrangements are hard to supervise and governments can default on programme delivery just as they did on interest repayments. However there have been some successes.

The latest proposals from the UN are that debt will be written off if countries can show they have been following responsible economic policies for eight years. A number of countries are already in the scheme but there is a major problem. Eight years is far too long for a country that is becoming progressively destabilised as a result of grinding, overwhelming poverty. As events in Indonesia have showed, a country under pressure may begin to fall apart with riots, civil disorder and violent changes in government. The very policies designed to impose discipline can wreck a country.

Four years is long enough for an emerging country to take costly steps without any visible return. is a brilliant site for more.

Article written in 2000. Since then a large amount of debt has been written off but much remains.

* Patrick Dixon has given keynote presentations on a wide range of emerging markets issues in Central America, Latin America, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, Baltic States, Middle East, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia. He has been a conference speaker at events in Barbados, Belarus, Brazil, Burundi, China, Czech Republic, Democratic Republic of Congo, Egypt, Estonia, Fiji, Estonia, Hungary, India, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, Panama, Poland, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, Uganda, United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe.


Related news items:
Newer news items:
Older news items:

Thanks for promoting with Facebook LIKE or Tweet. Really interested to read your views. Post below.

Bridging Finance 4U
August 16, 2021 - 05:25

"In many cases, substantial parts of these loans were spent propping up corrupt regimes and lining the pockets of dictators." Yes, It is absolutely right.

Join the Debate! What are your own views?



Our cookie policy

We use cookies for statistical purposes. To comply with the e-Privacy Directive we need to ask your consent to place these cookies on your computer.

Your use of this site indicates acceptance of these terms. I accept